Skip to content

KHRP.ORG admin

Increase font size Decrease font size Default font size    Default color brown color green color red color blue color

For a future based on justice, equality and the rule of law

 
You are here: Home arrow Stay Informed arrow News archive arrow 2007 News arrow European Court condemns censorship of publisher in Turkey
Skip to content

Online Shop


List All Products


Advanced Search
Show Cart
Your Cart is currently empty.

Contact Details

KHRP
11 Guilford Street London
WC1N 1DH UK
Tel: 00 44 20 7405-3835
Fax: 00 44 20 7404-9088
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it

header_image5.jpg

header_image1.jpg

European Court condemns censorship of publisher in Turkey Print E-mail
Thursday, 15 July 2004

The European Court of Human Rights held on 13 July 2004 that Turkish authorities had violated the free expression of the owner and director of a publishing house and denied her a fair trial, in one of a series of cases brought to the Court by KHRP (Zarakolu v. Turkey, 26971/95, 37933/97).

Aysenir Zarakolu, the owner and director of the Belge Uluskararasi Yayincilik (BUY) Publishing House published a book in 1994 entitled 'Our Ferhat, Anatomy of a Murder'. The book concerned the torture and killing of Ferhat Tepe, a 19-year-old reporter for a pro-Kurdish newspaper who was abducted in 1993 by undercover agents of the State or by persons acting under their instructions. In May 2003, a further KHRP case to the European Court on behalf of Tepe's father established that the Turkish authorities' investigation into Tepe's killing was inadequate, constituting a violation of the right to life (Article 2) alongside violations of Article 13 and 38 (Isak Tepe v. Turkey, 27244/95).

The Istanbul State Security Court ordered the prohibition and confiscation of the book concerning Tepe's torture and killing under Article 8 of the Anti-Terror Law No. 3713 and Article 36 of the Turkish Penal Code. Zarakolu was sentenced to five months imprisonment and a fine.

KHRP took the applicant's case to the European Court, complaining that there had been violations of Articles 10, 6, 13, 14 and 18 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the European Convention on Human Rights. The applicant died in January 2002 but the Court ruled that her husband and two sons could pursue the case in their own capacity of victims of the violations.

The Court held that there had been violations of Article 10 (freedom of expression) and Article 6 (right to a fair trial), but that it was not necessary to examine the other complaints.




Recommend this Kurdish Human Rights Project article to your favourite social bookmark networks:
Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Live!Facebook!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!Furl!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!
 
< Prev   Next >

Latest Newsline

newsline 41
Download Newsline 42, the latest edition of KHRP's quarterly newsletter.

Login / Register