|
For a future based on justice, equality and the rule of law |
Stay Informed
News archive
1998 News
JUDGMENT IN THE CASE OF AYTEKIN V TURKEY BY THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS | Home |
| The Kurds |
| About KHRP |
| Stay Informed |
| KHRP Shop |
| The Feeney Centre |
| How to help |
| Work With Us |
| Contact |
List All Products |
|
|
Advanced Search |
|
| Show Cart | |
| Your Cart is currently empty. |
| JUDGMENT IN THE CASE OF AYTEKIN V TURKEY BY THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS |
|
|
| Monday, 23 November 1998 | |
|
Judgment Given on 23 September 1998 Background to the case:
According to the applicant, her husband stopped the car by the side of the road. The gendarme then shot in the direction of the car; the bullet entered through the rear window of the car and hit her husband's head, killing him instantly. While conceding that the shot which killed Mr Aytekin was fired by the gendarme, the Turkish Government claimed that the car had failed to stop, and that the gun had been fired at the tyres of the fleeing vehicle, after a warning shot had been fired into the air. The applicant argued that despite the criminal conviction before the Turkish Court, the proceedings against the gendarme were so biased and incomplete that they did not constitute an effective or adequate remedy. The applicant also argued that the Government should have brought the Commission's attention to the domestic proceedings at an earlier stage; details of these proceedings had only come to light in October 1996.
In particular, Mrs Aytekin complained of violations under the following articles:
Consequently, the Court held that the domestic remedies available to the applicant in respect of her grievances had not been exhausted. It is a pre-requisite to the consideration of the merits of the case that the applicant should exhaust all available and effective domestic remedies. In this case, therefore, the Court was unable to go on to consider the merits. |
| < Prev |
|---|