Skip to content

KHRP.ORG admin

Increase font size Decrease font size Default font size    Default color brown color green color red color blue color

For a future based on justice, equality and the rule of law

 
You are here: Home arrow Stay Informed arrow News archive arrow 1996 News arrow ELCI AND OTHERS V TURKEY DECLARED ADMISSIBLE BY THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
Skip to content

Visit Our Online Shop

Visit our shop

Online Shop


List All Products


Advanced Search
Show Cart
Your Cart is currently empty.

Contact Details

KHRP
11 Guilford Street London
WC1N 1DH UK
Tel: 00 44 20 7405-3835
Fax: 00 44 20 7404-9088
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it

header_image5.jpg

header_image1.jpg

ELCI AND OTHERS V TURKEY DECLARED ADMISSIBLE BY THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION OF HUMAN RIGHTS Print E-mail
Tuesday, 03 December 1996
On Monday the 2nd December 1996, following an oral admissibility hearing in Strasbourg, the European Commission of Human Rights declared the case of Elci and others v Turkey ( Application No. 23145/93) admissible. The case concerns the detention and torture of 16 lawyers in Diyarbakir, southeast Turkey in November 1993.

The lawyers who were detained are: Tahir Elci, Meral Danis Bestas, Mesut Bestas, Baki Demirahan, M. Arif Altinkalem, Sinasi Tur, Nevzat Kaya, Husniye Olmez, Sebahattin Acar, M Selim Kurbanoglu, Vedet Erten, Niyazi Cem, A Gazanger Abbasioglu, Fuat Demir, Iman Sahin and Arzu Sahin. 14 of the lawyers complained that while in detention they were subjected to torture. The forms of torture inflicted include being stripped naked and blindfolded, beaten, kicked, threatened with execution, deprived of food, deprived of sleep, falaka, subjected to cold high pressure water hosing, subjected to eletric shocks.

The applicants complained that they were detained without justification and for periods of up to 26 days in violation of Article Article 5 of the Convention. The applicants complained under Article 3 ( right to freedom from ill-treatment and torture)and Article 8 and Article 1 of Protocol 1 (the right to privacy and the right to peaceful enjoyment of property).

Many of these lawyers had been active in bringing complaints on behalf of human rights victims to the European Commission of Human rights. It was argued before the Commission that this was the reason for their detention and torture. This raises an issue under Article 25 of the Convention which guarantees the right of individuals to make petitions to the European Commission of Human Rights.

In the case of all of the lawyers the Commission found their application admissible under Articles 5(1), Article 8 Article 1 of Protocol 1 and inadmissible under Article 5(3) on account of failure to complain to the Commission within the 6 month time limit. The Commission found that the complaints under Article 3 were admissible in the case of nine of the applicants but not in the case of the other seven, again because of the application of the 6 month rule. The Commission stated that it would consider further whether the complaints under Article 25 were admissible.

The Commission will now proceed to further investigate this case and will then deliver a report on the facts and on whether Turkey is in breach of the European Convention in the case.

The case of Elci and others v Turkey is one of a series of cases against the State of Turkey raising serious allegation of human rights abuses, which is being assisted by the KHRP.



Recommend this Kurdish Human Rights Project article to your favourite social bookmark networks:
Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Live!Facebook!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!Furl!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!
 
< Prev   Next >

Latest Newsline

newsline-43
Download Newsline 43, the latest edition of KHRP's quarterly newsletter.

Login / Register